Home About Into the Cool BLOG Contents Purchase About the Authors Reviews Videos Links

Into the Cool, Part II, Chapter 9
Physics' Own "Organisms"

   

“A Taoist story tells of an old man who accidentally fell into the river rapids leading to a high and dangerous waterfall. Onlookers feared for his life. Miraculously, he came out alive and unharmed downstream at the bottom of the falls. People asked him how he managed to survive. "I accommodated myself to the water, not the water to me. Without thinking, I allowed myself to be shaped by it. Plunging into the swirl, I came out with the swirl. This is how I survived."

Alan Watts

Vortex—even the word induces vertigo, sucking us in with the archetypal power of a form that is also a function. The function is to reduce a gradient. Nature's abhorrence of a gradient extends beyond the temperature gradients of classical thermodynamics to pressure gradients in fluids. Here, simple physical systems jump to new, metastably cycling states. So-called Taylor vortices form from the flux, spinning at birth in different directions; they multiply in pairs with increases in the steepness of the pressure gradient that gives rise to them; and they show a kind of history or memory.

Forty years elapsed before Bénard convection was described by mathematics. By contrast, English physicist G. I. Taylor took a mere three years to solve major theoretical and experimental problems associated with patterns appearing in fluids between two rotating cylinders where a rotational pressure gradient is set up in the fluid between the cylinders. Taylor analyzed Rayleigh's stability criterion for rotating fluids. He predicted, in 1923, the conditions under which fluid vortices would pop into existence. Taylor conceived a set of ingenious experiments that used pressure gradients to produce complex flow systems. Whereas the highly organized complex Bénard cells are driven by temperature gradients, here pressure gradients are the subject of interest. Taylor (1923) built a simple but precise apparatus that consisted of two cylinders, of different diameters; the smaller one was placed inside the larger and the space between them was filled with a fluid. Both the outer and inner cylinder were attached to a rotary motor, an arrangement that allowed Taylor to spin either cylinder at various speeds around the sandwiched fluid. Because of the rotation of the fluid between the cylinders, centrifugal forces build up, producing a pressure gradient across the fluid. From this pressure gradient, as we will see, amazingly complex systems emerge and develop.

Each of the eight flow patterns displayed between twenty-two and thirty pairs of vortices. At any one time only a single fluid pattern of vortices existed. Nature, it seemed, engaged multiple ways of solving a given problem.

In Coles's and Taylor's work nature displays no intrinsic preference for one rather than another gradient-breaking solution. Just as a mathematical problem can be solved in more than one way, or a destination reached by more than a single route, inanimate equilibrium-seeking systems can be complex and cyclical, but different. No thermodynamic equivalent of a single correct answer on a standardized test exists. The peculiarities of nonequilibrium systems—their intricacy and memory, the number of cycles they incorporate, and their complexity—depend on their particular past. In their cyclicity they embody past modes of reaching equilibrium.

Here we see that the emergence of whirling energy-dependent systems, their path-dependent growth and history, and even a sort of reproduction to make use of increased energy flux, are not just properties of life. No chemical reactions, DNA, genes, or known language are present in these constrained fluids. Yet they show complexity, the sort of gradient-based intricacy that in its chemical form was required for genetics and the origins of life.

Back to top >

Part II: The Complex

8. Swirl World

9. Physics' Own "Organisms"

10. Whirlpools and Weather



Taylor flow
A
, Spiral Taylor flow between a rotating inner cylinder and a resting outer cylinder. Taylor vortices are produced in an apparatus that consists of two cylinders, one inside the other, with a fluid filling the gap between the cylinders. The cylinders can be turned individually or together in opposition to one another. The rotation of the cylinders produces lateral pressure gradients across the fluid. The coherent patterns formed in these apparatuses is another example of a gradient that produces macroscopic patterns from coherent microscopic molecules. In this system the gradients are rotational pressure gradients, not temperature gradients as in the case of Bénard cells.



An experiment showing the nonuniqueness of Taylor vortex flow. All three apparatuses are the exact same size and have the same working fluids and the same rotation rates, but show differing numbers of vortex pairs. Cylinder set A has thirty-two vortex pairs, and the column rotation was initiated with a sudden jerk. Cylinder set B has twenty-four vortex pairs and was started with a quasi-steady increase in rotation rate. Set C has twenty-one vortex pairs and was started while the fluid was filling the cylinders. Differing initial conditions control the final states of the systems. Intense dark lines mark vortex sinks, and the weak dark lines mark the location of radial outward motion. (Photograph courtesy of L. Koschmieder.)

© 2005 Hawkwood Institute • Eric D. SchneiderInto the Cool